Autotel v. Bureau Of Land Management
| Autotel |
| Bureau Of Land Management |
| 2:2012cv00164 |
| February 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Kent J. Dawson |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Environmental Matters |
| 05 U.S.C. ยง 551 Administrative Procedure Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
62
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 23 Motion for Summary Judgment and Granting Defendant's 27 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment in favor of Defendant and close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the Court's 20 Order Denying 17 MOTION to Supplement the Administratigve Record is Vacated. Plaintiff's 17 MOTION to Supplement is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Defendant Bureau of Land Management shall have until 4/6/2015 to file a Supplemental Administrative Record with the Court and with Plaintiff. The Supplemental Administrative Record files should be uploaded to a compact disc and manually filed with the Clerk's Office. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Granting 21 Motion Setting Briefing Schedule. Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Opening Brief due by 11/25/2013.Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment and Combined Opening brief and Response to Plaintiff&# 039;s Opening Brief due by 1/3/2014. Plaintiffs Combined Reply Brief And Response to Defendants Opening Brief due by 2/3/2014. Defendants Reply Brief due by 3/5/2014. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/21/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 17 Motion to Supplement Administrative Record. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/7/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER that the parties are ordered to file a joint status report no later than January 2, 2013. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/11/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER that Plaintiff shall have up to and including June 28, 2012 to file proof of service of the summons and complaint within the allowed time to the correct addresses. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 6/13/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Autotel v. Bureau Of Land Management | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Autotel | |
| Represented By: | Marianne Dugan |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Bureau Of Land Management | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
