Steelman Partners, LLP et al v. Sanum Investments Limited et al
| Paul Steelman Limited, Paul Steelman Design Group, Steelman Architecture Asia, Ltd and Steelman Partners LLP |
| Sanum Investments, Ltd, Jade Entertainment Group, Ltd and Fong Keng Van Property Investment Company Limited |
| 2:2012cv00198 |
| February 7, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| James C. Mahan |
| Contract: Recovery/Enforcement |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1330 Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
43
ORDER denying 40 Motion for Entry of Clerks Default. Plaintiff has thirty (30) days to cure the deficiency with respect to service of process on FKV. Failure to do so will result in dismissal of FKV for failure to timely file proof of service of process pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 4(m). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/16/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying 34 Motion for Relief from the Court's Order Granting Defendants Motions To Dismiss. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 5/1/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER that 19 and 20 Motions to Dismiss are GRANTED. All claims asserted against Defendants Sanum and Jade are DISMISSED without prejudice. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 3/21/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
