Grand Canal Shops II, LLC v. Iavarone
Grand Canal Shops II, LLC |
Riccardo Iavarone |
2:2012cv00213 |
February 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
Robert J. Johnston |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Contract Dispute |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 69 ORDER that this case shall be ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSED upon the records of this Court. The parties are required to file a stipulation and order for dismissal within 5 court days after the payment of all amounts contemplated by the settlement. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 05/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 55 ORDER Denying without prejudice against refiling it 48 MOTION for Summary Judgment . Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 10/28/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 47 ORDER Granting 46 Motion to Extend Time Deadlines. Dispositive motions shall be due no later than 30 days after the Court's decision on 34 MOTION to Amend Complaint; and the Joint Pretrial Order shall be due no later than 30 days after the Court's decision on 34 MOTION to Amend Complaint unless dispositive motions are filed in this action in which case, the date for filing the Joint Pretrial Order shall be suspended until 30 days after all dispositive motions have been decided by the Court. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/24/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 32 ORDER that 19 Motion to Amend Complaint is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 24 Motion to Strike Plaintiff's Reply and 28 Motion to Strike the Supplement are MOOT. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend, together w ith a proposed amended complaint which complies in every respect with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, within 14 days from the date of this order. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 12/4/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 21 AMENDED ORDER that the Amended Stipulated Discovery Plan 16 is DENIED AS MOOT based on the Second Amended Scheduling Order 18 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 8/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 11 ORDER Denying 5 Motion to Remand to State Court. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 4/19/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Grand Canal Shops II, LLC v. Iavarone | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Riccardo Iavarone | |
Represented By: | William E. Cooper |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Grand Canal Shops II, LLC | |
Represented By: | Anthony J. Celeste |
Represented By: | Lesley B. Miller |
Represented By: | Kaempfer Crowell Renshaw Gronauer & Fiorentino |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.