Connors v. Frontierland Communications et al
| Fredrick Connors |
| Frontierland Communications, NV Energy, State Of Nevada, US of A and Carson City |
| 2:2012cv00319 |
| February 28, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Lloyd D. George |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
21
ORDER adopting 17 Report and Recommendation that Plaintiff's Complaint be dismissed with prejudice. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that this matter is DISMISSED with prejudice. THE COURT FURTHER ORDERS that Plaintiff's 18 , 19 Motion for Injunctive Relief are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Lloyd D. George on 9/26/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DXS)
|
|
Filing
15
ORDER Granting 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall file Plaintiffs Complaint. The Complaint is dismissed without prejudice. Denying without prejudice 11 Motion to Appoint Counsel. Amended Complaint due within 30 days. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/10/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER Denying 6 Motion for Color of Law. Denying 7 Motion to Add Defendants. Denying 8 Motion to Add Charter Communications. Denying 9 Motion for Leave of Court. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/25/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
