Martinez et al v. PRLAP, INC et al
| Tina M Courtney, Thomas Zsidro and Daniel G Martinez |
| Juan Carillo, Susan Dana, Diane Derr, Gloria Juarez, Paul Kim, Amy Lemus, MTC FINANCIAL, Malcolm Cisneros Law Group, PRLAP, INC and Anthony Tran |
| 2:2012cv00345 |
| March 1, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting 47 Motion for Voluntary Dismissal Without Prejudice as to defendants Susan Dana and Diane Derr. Granting with prejudice 48 Motion to Dismiss Defendant PRLAP, Inc.s. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/1/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER THAT Plaintiff Daniel G. Martinezs Motion to Voluntarily Dismiss Without Prejudice 9 is GRANTED. Gloria Juarez, Paul Kim, Amy Lemus, MTC FINANCIAL, Malcolm Cisneros Law Group, Anthony Tran, Thomas Zsidro, Juan Carillo and Tina M Courtney terminated. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/20/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
41
ORDER that Plaintiff Daniel G. Martinez's Motion to Remand 8 and Amended Motion to Remand 23 are DENIED. Martinez's Motion to Strike 16 , Motion for Clarification (dkt. no. 1-E), and Motion for Disqualification of Opposing Counsel (dk t. no. 1-I) are DENIED. Martinez's Mandatory Judicial Notice of Pending Unopposed Motions Before the Court and Application of Default Judgment Against PRLAP Inc. 20 is DENIED. Martinez's Motion to Stay 33 is DENIED. The stay on discovery ordered on May 15, 2012, 28 is LIFTED. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER that 33 Motion to Stay Proceedings Pending the Outcome of Bankruptcy Proceedings in Title 11 is GRANTED to the extent that this case is stayed as to discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 21 Motion to Stay Discovery Pending Hearing on Pend ing Motions is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 24 Defendants' Proposed Joint Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 6/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
