Mackovska v. Recontrust Company, N.A. et al
| Andrijana Mackovska |
| Hasting Brokerage, Ltd., Recontrust Company, N.A., Soma Financing, Federal National Mortgage Association and Bank Home Loan Servicing, LP |
| 2:2012cv00421 |
| March 14, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| James C. Mahan |
| Real Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
26
JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants Bank Home Loan Servicing, LP, Federal National Mortgage Association, and ReconTrust Company, NA and against Andrijana Mackovska. Signed by Clerk of Court, Lance S. Wilson on 5/16/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
17
ORDER that defendant Hastings Brokerage Ltd's 8 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. The court will not, however grant Hastings' fees or costs. The court denies Ms. Mackovska's request seeking leave to amend. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER DISMISSING Soma Financing. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 5/31/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER OF RECUSAL. This action is referred to Chief Judge Robert C. Jones for reassignment. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/25/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ASB)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
