Caldwell v. Compass Entertainment Group LLC et al
Evert Caldwell |
Rounder, Inc., Gregory J. McDonald, Gregory T. McDonald, Jeffrey P. Kranzdorf, Suzanne M. Labelle, Thomas A. McDonald and Compass Entertainment Group LLC |
2:2012cv00458 |
March 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
George Foley |
Trademark |
15 U.S.C. ยง 44 Trademark Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 87 ORDER granting 82 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 59 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 48 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend complaint. Plaintiff's claims alleged in Counts III, IV, and VIII, are DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff may proceed with Counts I, II, V, VI, VII, and IX. See Order for details. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 01/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 43 ORDER Granting 42 Motion for Extension of Time to Respond to Amended Complaint. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/15/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 40 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 15 / 16 Motion to Dismiss; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with leave to amend; FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff file an amended complaint in compliance with this order within 1 4 days of entry of this order, failure to do so will result in the action being dismissed with prejudice; FURTHER ORDERED that the motion to dismiss based on improper is DENIED. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 11/6/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 35 ORDER that 12 Motion to Dismiss, or in the alternative, Quash Service is GRANTED to the extent that service of process executed on April 12, 2012 is QUASHED. FURTHER ORDERED that counsel for Defendant file notice within ten days of the entry of this order whether he is authorized to accept service of process on behalf of Defendant Kranzdorf. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 10/18/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 32 ORDER Granting in part and denying in part 26 Motion to Extend Time for Service. FURTHER ORDERED that 27 Motion for Service by Publication is Granted in part and Denied in part. (See Order for details). Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/27/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 25 ORDER Denying without prejudice 23 Motion to Allow for Service by Publication; and Denying without prejudice 24 Motion to Extend Time for Service. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 7/26/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 9 ORDER Granting 8 Motion for Pro Se Litigant to File Electronically. On or before 5/15/12, Plaintiff must provide certification that he has completed the CM/ECF tutorial and is familiar with the Electronic Filing Procedures, Best Practices, and the Civil & Criminal Events Menue that are accessible on this court's website. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 4/24/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 6 ORDER Granting 5 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond. Compass Entertainment Group LLC answer due 5/16/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr. on 4/16/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.