Holt v. US Bank N.A. et al
Plaintiff: Rodney Holt
Defendant: US Bank N.A. and Bank Of America, N.A.
Case Number: 2:2012cv00463
Filed: March 19, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Kent J. Dawson
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Real Property: Foreclosure
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
January 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 79 ORDER Denying 75 Motion for Order Granting Extension of Time to File First Amended Complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED and the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 1/16/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
September 7, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER Granting 32 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that 9 Motion to Remand to State Court is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 50 Motion to Expunge Lis Pendens is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff may file a motion for leave to amend which complies in every respect with this Order. Should Plaintiff choose to file a motion for leave to amend, he must do so within 14 days of the date of this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that this action is dismissed and 8 Motion for Declaratory Relief to De termine Defendant's True Standing to Collect; 11 Motion for Declaratory Relief; 22 Emergency Motion for Declaratory Relief; 23 Ex Parte Motion for Order Granting Plaintiff's Unopposed Motion for Preliminary Injunction; 25 Motion to Strike; 51 Motion for Hearing; 57 Motion for Protective Order; and 66 Motion for Order to Show Cause are DENIED as moot. Signed by Judge Kent J. Dawson on 9/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 22, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 69 ORDER Denying 60 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 8/22/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 30, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 43 ORDER Denying 42 Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/30/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 23, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER Denying 24 Motion to Strike. FURTHER ORDERED that 37 Motion to Strike is denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 5/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Holt v. US Bank N.A. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodney Holt
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: US Bank N.A.
Represented By: Donna M. Osborn
Represented By: Robin P. Wright
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Bank Of America, N.A.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?