Cunningham-Dirks et al v. State Of Nevada et al
Elaine Cunningham-Dirks and Dewey Dirks |
Valley Health Systems, State Of Nevada and American Medical Response |
2:2012cv00590 |
April 11, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Philip M. Pro |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 104 ORDER Confirming 97 Court's Order and 98 Clerk's Judgment. This action is DISMISSED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 9/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 102 ORDER Granting 99 Plaintiff's Motion for Continuance. This case are hereby STAYED to and including 5/1/2014 and the 98 Judgment is hereby VACATED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiffs obligation to file a Reply Memorandum (See Doc. [100 ]) to the instant Motion for Continuance is also VACATED. Plaintiffs shall have until 5/6/2014 within which to file a Late Response to 91 Defendant Summerlin Hospital's Motion for Summary Judgment. Defendant Summerlin Hospital shall have to and including 5/20/2014 within which to file a Supplemental Reply Memorandum. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 12/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 97 ORDER Granting Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLC's (incorrectly named as Valley Health Systems, LLC) 91 Motion for Summary Judgment. This case is dismissed and the Clerk of Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 11/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 74 ORDER Denying 71 Plaintiffs' Motion for Reconsideration of Denial for Extension of Filing. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 61 ORDER re 60 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order filed by Valley Health Systems. Parties must file a revised Joint Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order by 1/25/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/18/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 59 ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 8 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant American Medical Response, Inc.s Joinder to Defendant Summerlin Hospital Medical Center, LLCs Motion to Dismiss 12 is hereby GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED t hat 14 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Defendant American Medical Response, Inc.s Joinder to Defendant State of Nevadas Motion to Dismiss 17 is hereby GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 27 Motion for Leave of Court is DENIED. Plai ntiffs Dewey Dirks and Elaine Cunningham-Dirks shall have thirty (30) days from the date of this Order to file a Second Amended Complaint if they believe they can correct the noted deficiencies. Failure to comply with this Order will result in dismis sal, with prejudice, of the claims Plaintiffs are permitted to amend. FURTHER ORDERED that 42 Motion to Challenge the Constitutionality of Nevada Revised Statutes is DENIED. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 1/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 53 ORDER Denying 26 Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 39 State of Nevada's Initial Disclosures and 43 Plaintiffs' Initial Disclosures are STRICKEN. Discovery is TEMPORARILY STAYED until 01/08/2013. Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order due by 1/15/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 11/06/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.