Montgomery v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
| Bobby Lee Montgomery |
| Travis Chapman, City Council of Clark County, Nevada, City of Las Vegas, Nevada, S. Clowers, Shanon Clowers, Vincent D'Angelo, Cory Draeger, Josue Esparza, Eric Fenrich, Ron Fox, Douglas C. Gillespie, Oscar B. Goodman, Nathan Herlean, Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, J. Miranda, Shawn Morgan, E Robinson, Bryan Rocha, David Roger, Sheriff Of Clark County, A. Stege, V.E. Swartwood, Travis Swartz, B. Turner, Guy Louis Turner and J. Villani |
| 2:2012cv00817 |
| May 15, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Robert J. Johnston |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
84
ORDER Granting 69 Motion for Summary Judgment; Denying 73 Motion. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/19/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - JM)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER 62 Report and Recommendation of Magistrate Judge. Defendant's Motion to Strike Amended Complaint 52 is GRANTED. Plaintiff may continue to prosecute his Fourth Amendment search and seizure claims against Defendants Turner, Rocha, Herlean, Fenrich, Fox, Robinson and Miranda in their individual capacities. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER that 48 Motion is an affidavit that confirms oral representation that the state criminal proceeding has been terminated. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/7/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER Granting in part 51 MOTION to Extend Time regarding discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 42 Motion to Dismiss or Alternatively, Motion to Strike 41 Statement of Status. Defendants request to dismiss is denied and their request to strike is granted. Plaintiffs 41 Opposition Pleading is ordered stricken. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 1/9/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER Denying 35 Plaintiff's Motion for Disclosed Medical Records Order without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 08/27/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting 9 Clark County Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Granting in part and Denying in part 10 LVMPD Defendants' Motion to Dismiss; Granting 14 Defendant Goodman's Motion to Dismiss; and Denying 16 Plaintiff's Moti on for Judgment. Plaintiff is FURTHER ORDERED to file within 21 days a statement concerning the status of his underlying criminal proceedings, supported by a sworn affidavit or other documentary record. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 04/19/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER that a Status Hearing is set for 6/27/2012 01:30 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston. FURTHER ORDERED that only plaintiff, Bobby Lee Montgomery, is required to appear in Court for this hearing. The Clerk shall serve a copy of this Order on the Plaintiff via certified mail, return receipt requested. Signed by Magistrate Judge Robert J. Johnston on 5/23/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
