Levie v. Washington Mutual Bank et al
| Daniel Levie |
| Nevada Title, Washington Mutual Bank, Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems and JP Morgan Chase |
| 2:2012cv00858 |
| May 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Miranda M. Du |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1345 Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER Denying 27 Motion for Admiralty Jurisdiction and for Disqualification of District Judge. No further fillings will be accepted in this closed action. Failure to comply with this Order may result in sanctions. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 2/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER Granting 7 Motion to Dismiss. FURTHER ORDERED that 15 Petition for Abatement is DENIED. The Clerk is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/21/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER that Plaintiff shall file his Certificate as to Interested Parties, which fully complies with LR 7.1-1 no later than 4:00 p.m., June 21, 2012. Failure to comply may result in the issuance of an order to show cause why sanctions should not be imposed. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 6/7/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ECS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
