Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. Sergej Letyagin
Plaintiff: Liberty Media Holdings LLC
Defendant: Sergej Letyagin
Case Number: 2:2012cv00923
Filed: May 31, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Larry R. Hicks
Presiding Judge: George Foley
Nature of Suit: Copyright
Cause of Action: 17 U.S.C. ยง 101 Copyright Infringement
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 21, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 43 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED that Plaintiff and Defendants will bear their own attorneys' fees and costs related to this litigation, with all rights of appeal waived. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 11/21/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
February 14, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER that 16 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Liberty Media is granted discovery limited to the issue of the court's personal jurisdiction over Letyagin and Ideal. Such discovery must be completed on or before May 31, 2013. FURTHER ORDERED that 34 Liberty Media's Motion to Strike is DENIED. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/13/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 1, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting, as enumerated in the Order, 13 Motion for Leave to Conduct Immediate Discovery. (See Order for Details). FURTHER ORDERED that 20 Cross-Motion to Stay Discovery Pending a Ruling on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED in regard to other discovery, unless otherwise authorized by court order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/1/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 11, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 9 ORDER Granting Plaintiff's Ex Parte Motion for Alternate Service. (See Order for details.) Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/11/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 6, 2012 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that the documents contained in Plaintiff's Motion for Order Temporarily Sealing the Portions of the File shall be filed under seal. ORDERED that the documents contained in Plaintiff's Motion for Order Permitting Alternate Service of the Summons and Complaint on Defendants shall be filed under seal. ORDERED that the Complaint and supporting documents shall be filed under seal. ORDERED that immediately upon the Plaintiff filing a return of service indicating service by email, that the seal shall automatically dissolve. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 6/5/12. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Liberty Media Holdings LLC v. Sergej Letyagin
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sergej Letyagin
Represented By: James D. Boyle
Represented By: Evan Fray-Witzer
Represented By: Valentin D. Gurvits
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Liberty Media Holdings LLC
Represented By: Marc J Randazza
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?