Waugh et al v. Nevada State Board of Cosmetology
Wendy Robin and Lissette Waugh |
Nevada State Board of Cosmetology |
2:2012cv01039 |
June 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Kent J. Dawson |
George Foley |
Constitutional - State Statute |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 54 ORDER re 50 USCA Order and 51 USCA Mandate. Plaintiff's 1 Complaint is Dismissed and the Clerk of the Court shall close this file. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 45 ORDER Granting in Part and Denying in Part Plaintiffs' 27 Motion for Summary Judgment. Summary judgment is granted in Plaintiffs' favor on their claims under the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. Defendant's 29 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted in Part and Denied in Part. Summary judgment is granted in the Board's favor on Plaintiffs' claims under the First Amendment, the Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment, and the Privileges or Immunities Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment. The Clerk of Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 20 PROTECTIVE ORDER re 19 Joint MOTION for Protective Order filed by Wendy Robin, Lissette Waugh. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.