Depenbrock v. Neven et al
Jeffrey Scott Depenbrock |
Attorney General of the State of Nevada and D.W. Neven |
2:2012cv01327 |
July 26, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Carl W. Hoffman |
James C. Mahan |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 46 ORDER that 39 Second-Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED in its entirety. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/13/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 42 ORDER Granting 41 Unopposed Motion for an Enlargement of Time in Which to File a Reply to Answer. Petitioner's Reply to Respondents' 40 Answer due by 5/17/2016. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 01/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 38 ORDER Granting 37 Motion to Extend Time. Amended Petition due by 11/18/2015. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 10/28/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 32 ORDER Denying 24 Motion for Reconsideration. Denying as moot 26 Motion to Reconsider and 29 Motion to Extend Time. An amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is due within 120 days. Respondents shall have 30 days after serv ice of an amended petition to answer the amended petition. If petitioner does not file an amended petition, respondents shall have 30 days from the date on which the amended petition is due within which to answer, petitioners original petition. When respondents file an answer, petitioner shall have 30 days after service of the answer to file and serve a reply. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 1/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 23 ORDER Granting 22 Motion to Extend Time. Upon Reconsideration 2 MOTION for Appointment of Counsel is Granted. The Federal Public Defender shall be provisionally appointed as counsel and shall have 30 days to undertake direct representation of petitioner or to indicate an inability to do so. Denying without prejudice 15 Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 9/23/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 12 ORDER that respondents shall respond as per the particular directives of the prior 11 order within 60 days running instead from entry of this current order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 6/27/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 11 ORDER that respondents shall have 60 days from entry of this order within which to respond to the petition, as amended. Petitioner shall have 30 days from service of the answer, motion to dismiss, or other response to file a reply or opposition. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 5 ORDER Denying 2 Petitioner's Motion for Appointment of Counsel. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the clerk of court shall file the petition and that Petitioner shall have 60 days to file an amended petition setting forth all of his claims that he intends to pursue in this matter. The clerk shall SEND Petitioner a copy of the petition and 2 counsel motion with this order. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 03/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Petition and 2 Motion to Petitioner - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.