Lo v. Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae
Plaintiff: Sam Saihung Lo
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Case Number: 2:2012cv01411
Filed: August 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Contract: Other
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 1442 Petition for Removal
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 6, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 81 ORDER that 42 Defendant Federal National Mortgage Association's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/6/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 9, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 73 ORDER that 68 Motion for Sanctions is GRANTED in part and DENIED in part. FURTHER ORDERED that Fannie Mae AMEND its discovery responses as outlined above by January 7, 2015. FURTHER ORDERED by STIPULATION of the parties that Sam Saihung Lo' s opposition to Fannie Mae's Motion for Summary Judgment is due February 6, 2015. FURTHER ORDERED that 67 Motion to Extend is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 71 ORDER that a Hearing re 65 Stipulated Order of Established Facts and re 68 Motion for Sanctions for Discovery Abuse is scheduled for 12/9/2014 at 01:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3D before Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
June 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Compel Compliance with Subpoena Duces Tecum. Jason Abrams Professional Corporation d/b/a Abrams Groups At Luxury Homes of Las Vegas must fully comply with the Subpoena Duces Tecum, as modified herein, by June 17, 2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
April 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER Denying 20 Motion for Order to Show Cause. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that any opposition to 23 MOTION to Compel is due 5/6/13. Any reply is due 15 days after service of the opposition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk mail a copy of this Order and 23 Motion to Compel to Abrams Groups' counsel at the address in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Lo v. Federal National Mortgage Association d/b/a Fannie Mae
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Federal National Mortgage Association
Represented By: Christopher L. Benner
Represented By: Chelsea Crowton
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Sam Saihung Lo
Represented By: Robert Duane Frizell
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?