Romm v. Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest et al
| Evelyn Romm |
| Hartford Fire Insurance Company and Hartford Insurance Company of the Midwest |
| 2:2012cv01412 |
| August 9, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Insurance Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
28
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 27 Stipulation for Dismissal with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 11/28/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
24
ORDER Granting 4 Motion to Dismiss with leave to amend in part. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 6 Motion to Dismiss for Summary Judgment is Denied as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/2/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER that parties shall file a joint status report no later than 4:00 pm, 10/1/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 9/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
18
MINUTE ORDER that oral argument set for 11/26/12 re 4 and 6 Motions to Dismiss is VACATED. The court will issue a written order on the pleadings. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 9/17/2012. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
