Webster et al v. National Default Servicing Corporation, Inc. et al
| James F. Webster and Oksana Webster |
| National Default Servicing Corporation, Inc., Bank of America, N.A. and Bank of New York Mellon |
| 2:2012cv01482 |
| August 21, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Peggy A. Leen |
| Real Property: Foreclosure |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1444 Petition for Removal- Foreclosure |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
24
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 23 Stipulation of Dismissal. Each party to bear its own attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 08/08/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 no later than 4:00 p.m., 08/08/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 07/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. All claims are DISMISSED except those for violations of NRS 107.080. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the 4 Defendants' Motion to Remove Lis Pendens is DENIED. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 01/10/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
