Escamilla v. Neven et al
| Francisco Escamilla |
| Attorney General for the State of Nevada and D. W. Neven |
| 2:2012cv01640 |
| September 18, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Philip M. Pro |
| George Foley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
9
ORDER that the time for Petitioner to respond to the prior 6 Order is extended up to and including 60 days from entry of this Order. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall file the Petition. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 3/14/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER that within 30 days of entry of this order, Petitioner shall SHOW CAUSE in writing why the Petition should not be dismissed with prejudice as time-barred. IT FURTHER IS ORDERED that all assertions of fact made by Petitioner in response to this show cause order must be detailed, must be specific as to time and place, and must be supported by competent evidence. Signed by Judge Philip M. Pro on 2/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
