U.S. Specialty Insurance Company v. Carvalho et al
| U.S. Specialty Insurance Company |
| CAM Consulting, Inc., Angelo Carvalho, Crest Ridge, LLC, Joint Forces, LLC, Premier Mechanical, LLC, Anthonette Spilsbury, Brian Spilsbury, Brian E. Spilsbury, Dee Ann Spilsbury, Kevin Spilsbury, Kevin J. Spilsbury and R. Glen Woods |
| 2:2012cv01688 |
| September 25, 2012 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Larry R. Hicks |
| George Foley |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
113
ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 112 Stipulation of Dismissal without prejudice. Each party to bear their own attorney's fees and costs. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 03/06/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER that counsel for the parties shall file a joint pretrial order which fully complies with the requirements of LR 16-3 and LR 16-4 by 3/3/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 02/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
110
ORDER Denying 109 Stipulation to Reschedule Hearing on Motion and Denying 92 Plaintiff's Motion to Stay without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 01/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
106
ORDER that 59 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that 73 Motion to Amend is GRANTED provided the Third Amended Complaint is revised to comply with this Order. FURTHER ORDERED that 76 Motion to Strike or Disregard the Declaration of Kevin Spilsbury is GRANTED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
105
ORDER Granting 104 Motion to Continue Hearing. The Motion Hearing re 92 Motion to Stay is continued to 12/13/2013 at 09:30 AM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge George Foley Jr. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/14/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER Granting 86 Motion to Extend Time to Respond/Reply re 76 MOTION to Strike or Disregard the Declaration of Kevin Spilsbury. Responses due by 8/22/2013. Reply deadline extended two weeks. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/6/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER Granting 64 Motion to Extend Time to Respond/Reply re 59 MOTION to Dismiss, Alternatively to Strike, or Alternatively to Stay The Third Party Complaint and To Compel Arbitration. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 6/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
56
ORDER denying as moot 32 Motion to Dismiss and 34 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/14/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER that the Stipulated Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order 45 is denied, without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order in compliance with LR 26-1(d), including any request f or special scheduling review, no later than March 28, 2013. The revised discovery plan should state the reasons why a longer discovery period should be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 3/18/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
