Schmidt et al v. Red Rock Financial Services
Plaintiff: James McFarlane, Adria Schmidt and Michael Schmidt
Defendant: Red Rock Financial Services
Case Number: 2:2012cv01773
Filed: October 9, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Peggy A. Leen
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Consumer Credit
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Jury Demanded By: Both

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 29, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 58 ORDER DENYING as MOOT 45 MOTION for Final Approval of Class Action Settlement and 46 MOTION for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/29/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
February 4, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER Granting 43 Ex Parte Motion to Continue the Final Fairness Hearing and Extend all Related Deadlines. Joint Motion for Final Approval due by 5/20/2014. Responses due by 5/27/2014. Final Fairness Hearing reset for 7/21/2014 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 02/04/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
October 15, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 41 ORDER Granting 40 Motion for Order Conditionally Certifying the Settlement Class, Preliminary Approval of Class Settlement Agreement, Directing that Notice be Sent to Class Members, and Scheduling a Final Fairness Hearing. Fairness Hearing set for 3/6/2014 10:00 AM in LV Courtroom 6A before Judge James C. Mahan. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
September 16, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 39 ORDER that 38 Motion For An Order For: (1) Preliminary Approval Of Class Settlement Agreement; (2) Directing That Notice Be Sent To Class Members; And (3) Scheduling A Final Fairness Hearing is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 9/16/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
April 10, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 17 ORDER that 12 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction is DENIED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 4/10/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Schmidt et al v. Red Rock Financial Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: James McFarlane
Represented By: Mark J Bourassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Adria Schmidt
Represented By: Mark J Bourassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Michael Schmidt
Represented By: Mark J Bourassa
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Red Rock Financial Services
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?