Brown v. Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. et al
Harry Ray Brown |
One World Technologies, Inc., Ryobi Technologies, Inc. and Techtronic Industries North America, Inc. |
2:2012cv01947 |
November 10, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Personal Inj. Prod. Liability |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 36 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Granting 35 Stipulation of Discontinuance with prejudice. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 09/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 31 ORDER that the parties shall comply with the requirements of LR 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuits decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined in the order, with respect to any documents filed under seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 02/21/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Filing 23 ORDER Denying 22 Proposed Discovery Plan/Scheduling Order without prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the parties are to file a revised Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, including a statement of the reasons why longer or different time periods should apply to the case, no later than 1/30/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 01/23/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.