Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd. et al
Plaintiff: Hypertherm, Inc.
Defendant: Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc. and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc.
Case Number: 2:2012cv01952
Filed: November 13, 2012
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Patent
Cause of Action: 15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 31, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER Adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. Granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is hereby awarded $38,821.76 against defendants WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc., jointly and severally. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
February 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Seal DECLARATION of Joseph A. Capraro as to 25 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
January 13, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 23 DEFAULT JUDGMENT and Permanent Injunction in favor of Hypertherm, Inc. and against WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd. et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Hypertherm, Inc.
Represented By: Joseph A. Capraro, Jr.
Represented By: Steven M. Bauer
Represented By: W. West Allen
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc.
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?