Hypertherm, Inc. v. Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd. et al
Hypertherm, Inc. |
Profile Cutting Technologies Ltd., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc. and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. |
2:2012cv01952 |
November 13, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Patent |
15 U.S.C. ยง 1126 Patent Infringement |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 30 ORDER Adopting 29 Report and Recommendation. Granting 25 Motion for Attorney Fees. Plaintiff is hereby awarded $38,821.76 against defendants WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc., jointly and severally. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 3/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 28 ORDER Granting 26 Motion to Seal DECLARATION of Joseph A. Capraro as to 25 MOTION for Attorney Fees and Costs. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 2/14/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 23 DEFAULT JUDGMENT and Permanent Injunction in favor of Hypertherm, Inc. and against WestingCut Electric (Shanghai) Inc., WestingCut Industrial Technology (Anhui) Inc., and WestingCut Industrial Technology (Shanghai) Inc. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.