Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Nevada Title Company
Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation |
Mark A Gonzalez and Nevada Title Company |
2:2012cv02060 |
December 3, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Larry R. Hicks |
Contract: Other |
12 U.S.C. ยง 1819 Default of Promissory Note |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 62 ORDER Granting 61 Stipulation of Dismissal with Prejudice. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 2/2/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 57 ORDER Approving 56 Notice of Settlement in Principle. FURTHER ORDERED that attendant discovery, dates and deadlines are stayed for 60 days. Signed by Judge Larry R. Hicks on 7/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 20 ORDER Granting 19 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorneys Sheri M. Thome and L. Joe Coppedge substituted in place and stead of Terry A. Moore for Nevada Title Company. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/24/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 11 ORDER that Plaintiff FDIC's 8 Ex Parte Application for Enlargement of Time in Which to Effectuate Service of Process is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff has up to and including June 1, 2013, to effect service upon defendant Mr. Gonzalez. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 4/2/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.