Juliano v. Clark County Detention Center et al
Joseph Juliano |
Rebecca Newman, Naphcare, Inc., Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department, Douglas Gillespie and Clark County Detention Center |
2:2012cv02160 |
December 19, 2012 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Robert C. Jones |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1441 Petition for Removal- Civil Rights Act |
Defendant |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 20 ORDER that 17 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice and without leave to amend. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk shall ENTER JUDGMENT accordingly and close this case. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 3/25/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD) |
Filing 15 ORDER that the Clerk shall file the complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that plaintiff's complaint is DISMISSED with LEAVE TO AMEND. Plaintiff shall have 30 days from the date this order is entered to file his amended complaint. FURTHER ORDERED that [10 ] Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 6 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that 9 Motion for Extension of Time is DENIED as moot. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 1/29/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; copy of forms w/instructions and copy of original complaint to plaintiff - MMM) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.