Nguyen v. Collins et al
Lan Thi Tran Nguyen |
Holland and Collins |
2:2013cv00273 |
February 20, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Miranda M. Du |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 7 ORDER that 1 Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis is DENIED as moot. FURTHER ORDERED that 2 and 4 Motions for Appointment of Counsel are DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that the complaint is DISMISSED with prejudice, in its entirety, fo r failure to state a claim. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. FURTHER ORDERED that this Court CERTIFIES that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(3). Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 4/26/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM) |
Filing 3 ORDER that the Clerk of Court SHALL FILE IN THE INSTANT CASE documents at dkt. no. 1 and dkt. no. 2 which were filed in case number 2:13-cv-00274-MMD-PAL. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL FILE a copy of this order in case number 2:13-cv-00274-MMD-PAL. The Clerk of Court SHALL CLOSE case number 2:13-cv-00274-MMD-PAL. Plaintiffs claims SHALL PROCEED under the instant case number. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 02/22/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.