Bank of America, N.A. v. Hecker et al
| Victor Hecker, Janet Zobrist and R. Phil Zobrist |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| Bank of America, N.A. |
| Victor Hecker, Janet Zobrist and R. Phil Zobrist |
| 2:2013cv00463 |
| March 19, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-(Citizenship) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
40
ORDER Granting BANA's 37 Motion for Summary Judgment.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Judgment shall be entered in BANA's favor as to the claims set forth in the Complaint as well as Defendants' Counterclaims. IT IS FURTHER ORDE RED that the Judgment reflect the Court's declaring that Plaintiff Bank of America, N.A. is excused from further performance under the settlement agreement at issue in this action.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Notice of Pendency of Action f iled and recorded by or on behalf of Defendants upon the real property located at 8593 Verde Park Circle, Las Vegas, Nevada 89129 (APN # 138-05-613-019) with the Clark County Recorder's Office as instrument number 201005240004814 is hereby canc elled and expunged.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall record a copy of this Order withthe Clark County Recorder's Office within (14) days of its issuance. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 9/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
