Zabelny v. CashCall, Inc.
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|Date Filed||#||Document Text|
|January 8, 2014
ORDER Granting 6 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss and Denying as moot 40 Plaintiff's Motion to Use Exhibits. The parties shall immediately meet and confer to make the arrangements to schedule an arbitration in Orange County, California as expeditiously as possible. This action is DISMISSED, and the clerk of the court shall enter judgment in favor of the Defendant accordingly. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 01/07/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|August 2, 2013
ORDER that 36 Emergency Motion to Stay is GRANTED. Briefing on 34 Motion for Conditional Certification is STAYED pending the Court's decision on 6 Defendant's Motion to Compel Arbitration. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 8/2/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|July 25, 2013
ORDER that 33 Motion for Leave to File a Response to Plaintiff's Sur-Reply re 6 Motion to Compel is GRANTED. CashCall shall file its response, not to exceed five pages, within five days of the Court's Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/25/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|July 12, 2013
ORDER Granting 28 Motion for Leave to File Sur-Reply re 24 Notice of New Authority re 6 MOTION to Compel Arbitration and Dismiss or, Alternatively, Stay Action. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 7/11/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?