Steffen v. DMATRIX, Inc. et al
| Mark Donald Steffen |
| Lana R Rucker, Beverly Rosherral, DMATRIX, Inc., David Charlton, Michael Amie and Ricky Towers, Jr. |
| 2:2013cv00876 |
| May 17, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Securities/Commodities |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Securities Violation |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
ORDER that plaintiff's first, second, third, fourth, and eighth claims are dismissed with prejudice; FURTHER ORDERED that 34 Defendant Michael Amie's motion to dismiss the complaint for lack of subject-matter jurisdiction is GRANTED; the court declines to continue to exercise supplemental jurisdiction over plaintiff's remaining state law claims (fifth,sixth, and seventh claims), which are hereby dismissed without prejudice to their refiling in state court.The clerk of court is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 12/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER Granting 23 Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's First, Second, Third, Fourth, and Eighth Causes of Action. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
