Jones v. State of Nevada Board of Medical Examiners
| Dr. Carmen Jones |
| State of Nevada Board of Medical Examiners |
| 2:2013cv00996 |
| June 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
25
ORDER that 21 Motion for Reconsideration of the Order Based on Error of Law is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 2/13/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that sanctions, including monetary sanctions and a recommendation for civil contempt, shall not be imposed on Bradley Van Ry for his failure to comply with a court order in violation of Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 16(f) and Local Rule IA 4-1. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 1/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that 7 Motion for Partial Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Plaintiff is granted until February 7, 2014, to file an amended pleading. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 1/27/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
