Richardson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Plaintiff: Craig Jeremy Richardson
Defendant: Jeremy Jacobitz, Kvan and Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Case Number: 2:2013cv01481
Filed: August 19, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Presiding Judge: James C. Mahan
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights: Other
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 21, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 53 ORDER that 46 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED. The clerk is ordered to close the case and enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 22, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 45 ORDER that 43 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines re 33 Scheduling Order is GRANTED. The following deadlines apply: Discovery due by 2/3/2015. Motions due by 3/9/2015. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 4/3/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/22/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
July 2, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 35 ORDER that 13 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 7/2/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
May 7, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 30 ORDER that 29 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically at the hearing on May 7, 2014 at 3:30 p.m. is DENIED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/7/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
December 11, 2013 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendation in its entirety. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department is DISMISSED with prejudice. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Fifth Amendment Claim (Count 3) and Thirteenth Amendment Claim (Coun t 4) are dismissed with prejudice. The remaining claims may proceed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the clerk file complaint, issue summons to the defendants still remaining, deliver the same to the US Marshal for service, and send blank copies of the USM-285 forms to the plaintiff. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 12/11/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Richardson v. Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Jeremy Jacobitz
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kvan
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Las Vegas Metropolitan Police Department
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Craig Jeremy Richardson
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?