Wesley v. Director Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Petitioner: Narcus Wesley
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Director Nevada Department of Corrections
Case Number: 2:2013cv01513
Filed: August 21, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Carl W. Hoffman
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 17, 2016 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that 36 Wesley's amended petition for writ of habeas corpus is DENIED; and I decline to issue a certificate of appealability. The Clerk of Court is instructed to enter judgment for respondents and against petitioner and to CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
July 8, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Enlargement of Time. The deadline for response is extended to 7/17/2015. This deadline will not be further extended without showing of extraordinary circumstances. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/8/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
April 30, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER Granting 28 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to 9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Attorney General of the State of Nevada and Director Nevada Department of Corrections answer due 6/30/2015. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 4/30/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
March 19, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 27 ORDER that 25 Motion to Amend Complaint is GRANTED. The clerk of the court shall file the amended petition. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 13 MOTION to Dismiss is GRANTED. Grounds 2, 6, and 14 of the amended petition are DISMISSED because t hey are unexhausted. Ground 13 of the amended petition is DISMISSED with prejudice because it is procedurally defaulted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that ground 3 of the amended petition is DISMISSED. Answer due 5/1/15. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 3/18/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
July 11, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER Granting 11 Motion to Extend Time to Respond to the Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus. Answer due 8/21/2014. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 7/10/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Wesley v. Director Nevada Department of Corrections et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General of the State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Director Nevada Department of Corrections
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Narcus Wesley
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?