Downing v. Attorney General State of Nevada et al
Petitioner: Curtis L. Downing
Respondent: Attorney General State of Nevada and Brian Williams
Case Number: 2:2013cv01576
Filed: August 29, 2013
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Jennifer A. Dorsey
Presiding Judge: Cam Ferenbach
Nature of Suit: Habeas Corpus (General)
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
August 10, 2017 Opinion or Order Filing 23 ORDER that 9 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus is DENIED on the merits, and this action is DISMISSED with prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that a certificate of appealability is DENIED. The Clerk of Court is directed to enter judgment in favor of respondents and against Downing and CLOSE THIS CASE. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/9/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 20, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 19 ORDER that 11 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that respondents have until September 21, 2015, to FILE and SERVE and ANSWER to Ground 1 of the petition. No further motions to dismiss will be entertained. FURTHER ORDERED that petitoner will have 30 days after being served with the answer to file a reply. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/20/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
November 3, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 16 ORDER that 14 Motion to Extend Time to Respond re 11 MOTION to Dismiss re: 9 PETITION for Writ of Habeas Corpus is GRANTED. Petitioner's opposition shall be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of entry of this order. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 11/3/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
August 6, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 8 ORDER that 7 Motion for Reconsideration is GRANTED. The Dismissal Order and Clerk's Judgment 5 and 6 are SET ASIDE. The Clerk shall reopen this action, file and electronically serve the petition upon the respondents who will have 45 days from entry of this order to answer/respond. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 8/6/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
January 14, 2014 Opinion or Order Filing 5 ORDER that this action is DISMISSED based on petitioner's failure to pay the filing fee in compliance with this Court's order. The Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/14/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Downing v. Attorney General State of Nevada et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Attorney General State of Nevada
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Brian Williams
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Curtis L. Downing
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?