Rockwell Automation, Inc. v. Beckhoff Automation LLC et al
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
| Beckhoff Automation GmbH and Beckhoff Automation LLC |
| Beckhoff Automation GmbH and Beckhoff Automation LLC |
| Rockwell Automation, Inc. |
| 2:2013cv01616 |
| September 5, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Robert C. Jones |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Patent |
| 35 U.S.C. ยง 271 Patent Infringement |
| Both |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
137
ORDER that counsel shall comply with the requirements of Local Rule 10-5(b), the Ninth Circuit's decision in Kamakana, 447 F.3d 1172, and the procedures outlined above, with respect to any documents filed under seal. To the extent any aspect of the stipulated protective order may conflict with this order or Local Rule 10-5(b), that aspect of the stipulated protective order is hereby superseded with this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 6/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
127
ORDER re 126 Order staying discovery as to Defendant Beckhoff Automation GmbH except as to jurisdictional discovery. The Court hereby ORDERS the parties to submit, no later than June 6, 2014, a joint statement as to how that stay impacts the pending discovery motions. Docket Nos. 103 , 107 , and 114 . Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/30/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
112
ORDER that the telephonic hearing re 106 Emergency MOTION to Extend Time to Provide L.R. 16.1-10 Responses set for 5/9/14 at 1:30 p.m. is CONTINUED to 5/12/2014 at 01:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. In the interim, the Court hereby EXTENDS the deadline to provide the responses required under Local Rule 16.1-10 to May 14, 2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/9/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
111
ORDER Setting a Telephonic Hearing re 106 Emergency MOTION to Extend Time to Provide L.R. 16.1-10 Responses for 5/9/2014 at 01:30 PM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/8/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
98
PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/27/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
95
ORDER that the parties submit, no later than March 3, 2014, a revised stipulated protective order in accordance with the Court's rulings in this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/24/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER that 90 and 91 Proposed Protective Order are DENIED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Court furtherORDERS that the parties submit a stipulated protective order no later than February 12, 2014 at 3:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/10/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
87
ORDER that 67 Motion to Stay is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that 68 Motion for Protective Order is DENIED without prejudice. Within 7 days hereof, the parties shall submit a proposed discovery plan and a stipulated protective order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/31/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER re 73 Order to Show Cause, 76 Amended Order to Show Cause. The Court will sanction attorneys Chad Fears, Paul Shakespear, Peter Lancaster, and Kenneth Levitt in a Court fine of $350, imposed jointly and severally. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/28/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; cc Finance - MMM)
|
|
Filing
63
ORDER Denying without prejudice 60 Proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order. Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order due within 7 days. Motions due by 11/22/2013. Responses due by 12/3/2013. Replies due by 12/7/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/15/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER that the hearing on 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction scheduled for 10/29/13, is moot and is vacated pending further order of the court. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/17/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
45
TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER Granting in part and Denying in part 7 Motion for Temporary Restraining Order. Motion Hearing re 8 Motion for Preliminary Injunction set for 10/29/2013 and 10/30/2013 09:00 AM in Reno Courtroom 6 before Chief Judge Robert C. Jones. Signed by Chief Judge Robert C. Jones on 10/7/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER that Rockwell serve 7 Emergency MOTION for Temporary Restraining Order upon all Defendants no later than 9/10/13 at 5:00 pm and file proof no later than 5:00 pm, 9/13/13. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file any Opposition to 7 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order no later than 9/13/13, at 5:00 pm. Rockwell shall file any Reply no later than 9/16/13, at 5:00 pm. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that a Motion hearing re 7 Emergency Motion for Temporary Restraining Order is set for 9/19/2013, at 1:30 pm in LV Courtroom 6D before U.S. District Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 9/9/13. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
