Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc. v. Capriati Constructions Corp, Inc. et al
| Ergon Asphalt & Emulsions, Inc. |
| Capriati Constructions Corp, Inc., Fidelity and Deposit Company of Maryland and Zurich American Insurance Company |
| 2:2013cv01683 |
| September 13, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Gloria M. Navarro |
| Contract: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
95
ORDER Granting 94 Stipulation of Dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/17/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
92
ORDER Granting 87 Stipulation for Substitution of Counsel. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 2/16/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
83
ORDER Setting a Hearing re 82 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney for 11/18/2015 at 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3A before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Any response to that motion shall be filed no later than November 13, 2015. Current counsel shall serve a copy of this order on each Defendant, and shall file a proof of service on the docket no later than November 13, 2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
70
ORDER Granting 69 Stipulation to Extend Time to Respond to 68 Motion for Attorney Fees. Response due by 6/2/2015. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
|
|
Filing
65
ORDER that 41 Ergon's Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Ergon's unjust enrichment claim and Ergons claim against bond.FURTHER ORDERED that 45 Ergon's Motion for Summary Judgment as to Defendants' Counterclaims i s GRANTED.FURTHER ORDERED that 46 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED as to Ergon's Claims for breach of contract and breach of the covenant of good faith and fair dealing.FURTHER ORDERED that 50 Defendant Capriati& #039;s Motion for Summary Judgment is DENIED. FURTHER ORDERED that judgment be entered in the amount of $224,901.91 in favor of Ergon and against Defendants Capriati, Zurich, and Fidelity, jointly and severally. The Clerk is instructed to close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 4/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER granting 61 Stipulation to continue settlement conference. Settlement Conference reset for 3/18/2015 10:00 AM in LV Chambers before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
60
ORDER CONTINUING A SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE. The settlement conference in this case is hereby CONTINUED to commence at 10:00 a.m. on February 11, 2015, in the chambers of the undersigned Magistrate Judge, Third Floor, Lloyd D. George United States Courthouse, 333 Las Vegas Boulevard South, Las Vegas, Nevada. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER denying as moot 38 Motion to Withdraw; granting 43 Motion to Withdraw motion and vacate Hearing on Motion set for November 5, 2014, at 2:00 p.m. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
