Price v. Colvin

Price v. Colvin

Plaintiff:	Darlene Price
Defendant:	Carolyn W. Colvin
Case Number:	2:2013cv01735
Filed:	September 23, 2013
Court:	US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office:	Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge:	Carl W. Hoffman
Presiding Judge:	Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit:	Social Security: DIWC/DIWW
Cause of Action:	42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Jury Demanded By:	None

Follow case documents by RSS

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed	Document Text
July 29, 2015	Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 20 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full to the extent it is consistent with this opinion.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 13 Motion to Remand is DENIED and 15 Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED.The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
December 11, 2013	Filing 10 SPECIAL SCHEDULING ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF A SOCIAL SECURITY CASE. Defendant shall submit an electronic courtesy copy of the administrative record, under seal, to CM/ECF within 7 days of the filing of this Order. If Plaintiff intends to request a remand of this case on the basis of new evidence, Plaintiff shall do so within 30 days of the filing of this Order. Failure of a party to file a motion or points and authorities required by this Order may result in dismissal of the action or reversal of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Date Filed

Document Text

July 29, 2015

Filing 25 ORDER. IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that 20 Report and Recommendation is ACCEPTED and ADOPTED in full to the extent it is consistent with this opinion.IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 13 Motion to Remand is DENIED and 15 Cross-Motion to Affirm is GRANTED.The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 7/29/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)

December 11, 2013

Filing 10 SPECIAL SCHEDULING ORDER CONCERNING REVIEW OF A SOCIAL SECURITY CASE. Defendant shall submit an electronic courtesy copy of the administrative record, under seal, to CM/ECF within 7 days of the filing of this Order. If Plaintiff intends to request a remand of this case on the basis of new evidence, Plaintiff shall do so within 30 days of the filing of this Order. Failure of a party to file a motion or points and authorities required by this Order may result in dismissal of the action or reversal of the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 12/11/2013. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)

Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Price v. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Defendant: Carolyn W. Colvin
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]
Plaintiff: Darlene Price
Represented By:	Marc V Kalagian
Represented By:	Leonard H Stone
Search News	[ Google News \| Marketwatch \| Wall Street Journal \| Financial Times \| New York Times ]
Search Finance	[ Google Finance \| Yahoo Finance \| Hoovers \| SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web	[ Unicourt \| Justia Dockets \| Legal Web \| Google \| Bing \| Yahoo \| Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?