Aiken v. Snee et al
Patricia Aiken |
Thomas M. Snee, Ionetics, Inc., Endoprin, Inc., Cardioprim, Angioprim, Inc. and Thomas M. Snee II |
2:2013cv01768 |
September 26, 2013 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
James C. Mahan |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 38 ORDER denying as moot 34 Motion to Strike and denying 37 Motion for Hearing. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/27/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 35 ORDER denying 30 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider Order 28 on Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 10/6/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 28 ORDER granting 21 , 22 and 23 Defendants' Motions to Dismiss. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that this action is DISMISSED without prejudice for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The clerk is instructed to enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 8/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 17 ORDER Denying 2 Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment and Denying 16 Plaintiff's Motion for Expedited Consideration of Summary Judgment. Signed by Judge James C. Mahan on 04/02/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.