Speake v. Neven et al
| Lance E. Speake |
| D. Neven and Attorney General of the State of Nevada |
| 2:2013cv02015 |
| November 1, 2013 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
14
Order that 11 Petitioners motion of points and authorities is construed as an opposition to the motion to dismiss. The Clerk shall terminate the motion at Doc. 11 in the CM/ECF docket. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 8 respondents motion to dismiss is GRANTED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the petition is DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE as untimely. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that petitioner is DENIED A CERTIFICATE OF APPEALABILITY. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Clerk of Court SHALL ENTER JUDGMENT ACCORDINGLY. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 1/22/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER Granting 1 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 2 Motion to Appoint Counsel is DENIED. Clerk of Court shall file and electronically serve petition. Respondents shall have 45 days from entry of this order to answer or respond to petition. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 2/3/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
