Ross v. Lane Community College
| James E. Ross |
| Lane Community College |
| 2:2014cv00113 |
| January 22, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Carl W. Hoffman |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
29
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall transfer this matter to the District of Oregon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 7/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Granting 26 Plaintiff's Motion for E-Mail Documents. Plaintiff shall provide certification that he has completed the CM/ECF tutorial and is familiar with Electronic Filing Procedures by 6/20/2014. See Order for details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 06/02/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
22
ORDER Denying 21 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Summons. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 05/12/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER Denying 18 Plaintiff's Motion for Recusal of Magistrate Judge. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
16
ORDER that the Clerk of Court shall STRIKE 15 Plaintiff's Creative Writing Sample. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 14 Plaintiff's Motion for Service of Summons is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/25/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
12
ORDER Denying as moot 11 Plaintiff's Motion to Strike. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER that 4 Plaintiff's Amended Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Amended Complaint shall be due by 3/10/2014. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 7 Plaintiff's Motion/Request for Service is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 02/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
|
Filing
2
ORDER Granting 1 Plaintiff's Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall file Plaintiffs Complaint. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the Complaint is DISMISSED without prejudice. Plaintiff shall have until Wednesday, 2/26/2014 to file an amended complaint Signed by Magistrate Judge Carl W. Hoffman on 01/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AC)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Ross v. Lane Community College | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Lane Community College | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: James E. Ross | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
