Lee v. City of Las Vegas et al
||Robin M. Lee
||L.V. Metro Police and City of Las Vegas
||February 10, 2014
||US District Court for the District of Nevada
||Las Vegas Office
||Robert C. Jones
||Nancy J. Koppe
|Nature of Suit:
||Civil Rights (Prison Condition)
|Cause of Action:
||42:1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
|Jury Demanded By:
Access additional case information on PACER
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
|May 28, 2014
SCREENING ORDER Denying as moot 11 Motion/Application for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis. The Clerk of the Court shall file the 1 -1 Complaint. The Complaint is dismissed with prejudice in its entirety as amendment would be futile for fai lure to state a claim. This Court certifies that any in forma pauperis appeal from this order would not be taken in good faith. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment. Signed by Judge Robert C. Jones on 5/28/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|March 13, 2014
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 6 -1 Application to Proceed in Forma Pauperis without prejudice to file a new application. Within 30 days from the date of this order Plaintiff shall either: (1) file a fully complete application to proceed in for ma pauperis or (2) pay the full filing fee of $400. The Clerk of the Court shall retain the 1 -1 complaint, but shall not file it at this time. The 6 Motion to Extend Time to File In Forma Pauperis is Denied as moot and 7 Motion to Accept Document for Compliance re In Forma Pauperis Application is Denied. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/13/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - cc: forms mailed to Plaintiff - SLD)
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system.
A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?