Chicago Insurance Company v. Kummer, Kaempfer, Bonner, Renshaw and Ferrario et al
| Chicago Insurance Company |
| Kummer, Kaempfer, Bonner, Renshaw and Ferrario and Vistana Condominium Owners Association, Inc. |
| 2:2014cv00308 |
| February 27, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| Cam Ferenbach |
| Insurance |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2201 Declaratory Judgement (Insurance) |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
139
ORDER Granting 138 Stipulation of Dismissal as to Vistana Condominium Owners Association, Inc. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 8/10/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - ADR)
|
|
Filing
120
ORDER granting 112 Motion to Dismiss Patricia Arnott, Stephanie Lingle, and Jessica Quon and removing their attorneys from the service list. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 6/21/2016. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - AF)
|
|
Filing
118
ORDER Granting 117 Stipulation to Stay Briefing. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file monthly status reports notifying the Court as to the status of the underlying state court action. The first such status report shall be due by due by 5/31/16, with each subsequent report due every 30 days thereafter. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 4/26/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
79
ORDER Granting 76 Motion to Intervene filed by Jessica Quon, Patricia Arnott, Stephanie Lingle Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
74
ORDER re 73 Minute Order. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a telephonic hearing is scheduled for 1:00 p.m., 12/15/15. The parties must contact Jerry Ries, at 702-464-5416 by 11:00 a.m., 12/15/15, to provide him with a telephone number for the hearing. This hearing will be vacated upon the filing of the motionto intervene from Hutchinson & Steffen (representative of the Quon Estate). Counsel for parties in this action are directed to notify counsel from Hutchison & Steffan and Spilotro & Kulla, Chtd., of this telephonic hearing, scheduled for 1:00 p.m., 12/15/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER Granting 70 Motion to Allow Counsel for KKBRF in the Underlying Action to Appear Telephonically for Hearing set for 12/9/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/8/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
69
ORDER Granting 68 Motion for Leave to Appear. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/7/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
67
ORDER. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that a hearing on the Joint Unopposed Motion/Stipulation to Allow Parties in the Underlying Action to Participate in Settlement Conference Concerning the Pending Insurance Coverage Action 66 is scheduled for 11:00 a. m., 12/9/15, in courtroom 3D. Counsel for parties in this action are directed to invite counsel from Hutchison & Steffan (representative of the Quon Estate) and Spilotro & Kulla, Chtd. (representative of person and/or entities involved in the underlying fact pattern), to join the hearing on 12/9/15. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 12/4/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 63 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to file Reply in Support of 58 Plaintiff's Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/17/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
62
ORDER Granting 60 Stipulation to Extend Time re 58 MOTION to Dismiss. Defendant Kummer Kaempfer's Response due by 11/7/2015. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 11/3/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER re 43 Stipulation and Order to Extend Date for Filing of Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan. The Stay requested by the parties does not set a date certain for lifting the stay and will not be approved in that form. ORDERED that all discovery is st ayed in this case until the earlier of thirty (30) days after the court's decision on the pending dispositive motions or August 17, 2015; FURTHER ORDERED that the parties will not be required to file a proposed Discovery Plan and Scheduling Orde r until the earlier of thirty (30) days after the court's decision on the pending dispositive motions or August 17, 2015; After July 31, 2015, the parties may file a stipulation to further stay discovery and the filing of a Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, if the case is still pending. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 5/19/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER re 38 Stipulation to extend discovery deadline. All discovery is stayed in this case until the earlier of twenty (20) days after Defendant files an answer or May 18, 2015. The parties will not be required to file a proposed Discovery Pl an and Scheduling Order until the earlier of twenty (20) days after Defendant files an answer or May 18, 2015. After May 4, 2015, the parties may file a stipulation to further stay discovery and the filing of a new Discovery Plan and Scheduling Order, if the case is still pending and the Defendants have not filed an answer at the time of filing the new stipulation. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 1/20/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
