Horne v. Andres N. Bertotto S.A.I.C. et al
| Orlan Charles Horne |
| Andres N. Bertotto S.A.I.C. and Hidro Grubert U.S.A., Inc. |
| 2:2014cv00389 |
| March 17, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Tort Product Liability |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Product Liability |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
38
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 35 Motion for District Judge to Reconsider 34 Order and Denying 37 Second Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/14/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 26 Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's 31 Motion to Strike 29 Supplement to 28 Response to 26 Motion for Summary Judgment is Granted. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 5/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
34
ORDER Denying Plaintiff's 25 Motion for Default Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLD)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER Denying without prejudice 23 Motion for Protective Order and 24 Counter-Motion/Response to Motion. Renewed Motions due by 10/28/2014. Countermotion/Responses due by 11/4/2014. Replies due by 11/10/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
