Andes Industries, Inc. et al v. Lan et al
| Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International Inc. |
| EZconn Corporation, Cheng Sun Lan, Chi-Jen (Dennis) Lan, Polar Star Management Ltd., Kun-Te Yang and eGtran Corporation |
| 2:2014cv00400 |
| March 18, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| George Foley |
| Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
160
ORDER granting in part 128 Motion.; granting in part 130 Motion.; denying 140 Motion to Strike.; denying 156 Motion. Within 14 days of entry of this Order, the plaintiffs shall deposit into this court the $50,000 attorneys' fees previously awarded. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 1/24/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF, cc: Finance - JM)
|
|
Filing
150
ORDER that 146 RIPL's Motion to File Under Seal is granted as state in this order. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 6/23/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
132
ORDER Denying 131 Motion to Seal. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 5/11/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
125
ORDER Granting in Part 101 Motion for Attorney Fees. Defendants are awarded $50,000.00 in fees and costs in connection with this matter. Any other fee request is to be addressed to the judge in Arizona responsible for the remainder of this case. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 124 Motion for Hearing is DENIED. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 4/4/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
114
ORDER re 101 Motion for Attorney Fees. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 2/22/16. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
95
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Defendants EZconn Corporation and eGtran Corporation against Plaintiffs Andes Industries, Inc. and PCT International Inc. re 88 First Motion of Final Judgment. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 11/30/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - PS)
|
|
Filing
81
ORDER. IT IS ORDERED that the parties shall file a status report on or before 9/15/2015. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 8/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
80
ORDER Granting 75 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction and 18 Motion to Dismiss for Lack of Jurisdiction. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 3/25/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Denying without prejudice 35 and 38 Plaintiffs' Motion for Leave to Conduct Jurisdictional Discovery, to renew the motion if the District Courtdetermines that the Court has personal jurisdiction over the other Defendants. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 11/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER Granting 46 Plaintiffs' Motion to File Under Seal. Sealed documents 39 , 40 , 44 , and 45 shall remain sealed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 9/19/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER Granting 4 VERIFIED PETITION for Permission to Practice Pro Hac Vice for Attorney Christopher K. Larus and DESIGNATION of Local Counsel Attorney Justin C. Jones for PCT International Inc. Signed by Judge Andrew P. Gordon on 9/4/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
