McDonald et al v. State of Nevada et al
Ivar J. McDonald and Dennis McDonald |
Nevada Office of Attorney General, Nevada Department of Taxation and State of Nevada |
2:2014cv00545 |
April 10, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Cam Ferenbach |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Contract: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Breach of Contract |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 23 ORDER Granting 4 Defendants' Motion to Dismiss. Plaintiffs' Complaint 1 is dismissed. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that 13 Plaintiffs' Motion to Quash is DENIED. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that all pending motions are denied as moot. Clerk shall enter judgment accordingly and close the case. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 10/20/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Filing 19 MINUTE ORDER Granting 12 Motion for Pro Se Litigants to File Electronically. On or before 7/9/14, Plaintiffs Ivar J. McDonald and Dennis McDonald must provide separate certifications that they have completed the CM/ECF tutorial and are familiar with Special Order 109, Electronic Filing Procedures, Best Practices and the Civil & Criminal Events Menu that are accessible on this Courts website. Plaintiffs are not authorized to file electronically until said certifications from each pro se plaintiff are filed with the Court within the time frame specified. Signed by Magistrate Judge Cam Ferenbach on 6/24/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - EDS) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.