Johnson v. Department of the Air Force, et al
| Tanya E. Johnson |
| Department of the Air Force and Nellis AFB |
| 2:2014cv00631 |
| April 24, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
73
ORDER granting 72 Stipulation of Dismissal with prejudice. Case terminated. Signed by Judge Richard F. Boulware, II on 3/28/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
71
ORDER re: 70 Interim Status Report The Court ORDERS the parties to file a stipulation of dismissal no later than April 2, 2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 3/5/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
68
ORDER Granting 67 Motion to Extend Time. Plaintiff will have until Monday, February 12, 2018, to either retain new counsel, who must file a notice of appearance in accordance with the Local Rules, or to file a notice of intent to proceed pro se. No further extensions will be granted. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/10/2018. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
66
ORDER Granting 65 Motion to Extend Time to Seek Counsel. Plaintiff will have until Friday, January 5, 2018, to either retain new counsel, who must file a notice of appearance in accordance with the Local Rules, or to file a notice of intent to proceed pro se. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 12/4/2017. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
64
ORDER Granting 63 Motion to Extend Discovery Deadlines. Discovery due by 4/16/2018. Motions due by 5/16/2018. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 6/15/2018. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/8/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
57
ORDER re 56 Motion to Withdraw as Counsel for Plaintiff Tanya E. Johnson. Any response shall be filed no later than October 13, 2017. The Court hereby SETS a hearing on the motion for October 23, 2017, at 10:00 a.m. in Courtroom 3B.Plaintiff Tanya E. Johnson, her current counsel of record, and any newly retained counsel shall attend the hearing. THERE WILL BE NO EXCEPTIONS TO THESE APPEARANCE REQUIREMENTS. The failure to attend the hearing may result in the imposition of sanctions.No later than October 5, 2017, Plaintiff's current counsel of record shall serve Plaintiff with this order and shall file a proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 10/3/17. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER that 22 Motion to Defer Early Neutral Evaluation Session is GRANTED, and the ENE set for February 4, 2015 is VACATED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peggy A. Leen on 1/23/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
21
ORDER Granting 20 Motion to Stay Discovery. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 1/15/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
14
ORDER Granting 13 Motion to Extend Time to Answer/Respond re 1 Complaint. Department of the Air Force answer due 12/1/2014; Nellis AFB answer due 12/1/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/14. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
