Thiaw v. Ice/Department of Homeland Security
Birahima Douta Thiaw |
Ice/Department of Homeland Security, Henderson Detention Center and Lauer |
2:2014cv00698 |
May 5, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Miranda M. Du |
Carl W. Hoffman |
Habeas Corpus (General) |
28 U.S.C. ยง 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa |
None |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 16 ORDER denying 3 Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus filed by Birahima Douta Thiaw. It is further order that a certificate of appealability is denied. The Clerk of the Court shall enter judgment accordingly. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 8/11/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 11 ORDER granting 10 Motion TO ADMIT GOVERNMENT ATTORNEY TO PRACTICE IN THE DISTRICT OF NEVADA FOR DURATION OF ATTORNEYS GOVERNMENT EMPLOYMENT. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/21/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 5 ORDER that the Clerk shall serve copies of the petition and this order upon respondents. Respondents shall file and serve an answer to the petition within 20 days. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 7/3/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF; CC: USM - SLR) |
Filing 2 ORDER that Petitioner shall have 30 days to file an Amended Petition. Signed by Judge Miranda M. Du on 05/09/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - CC: Blank AO 242 forms and instructions sent to Petitioner - AC) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.