Gonzalez v. Officer John Doe
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Gonzalez
Defendant: Officer John Doe
Case Number: 2:2014cv00792
Filed: May 20, 2014
Court: US District Court for the District of Nevada
Office: Las Vegas Office
Presiding Judge: Nancy J. Koppe
Presiding Judge: Gloria M. Navarro
Nature of Suit: Prisoner: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Jury Demanded By: Plaintiff

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
November 10, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER re 45 Order to Show Cause. The Court hereby SANCTIONS Plaintiff in the amount of $200. Payment of the court fine shall be made to the Clerk, U.S. District Court no later than 11/30/2015. Plaintiff is also ordered to file a proof of p ayment on the docket by that date. Plaintiff is advised that failure to comply with this order may result in recommendation to the Chief District Judge for dismissal of his case with prejudice. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/10/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV)
July 14, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER: Motion Hearing re 39 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney set for 7/21/2015 at 03:00 PM in LV Courtroom 3C before Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe. Responses to 39 Motion to Withdraw due by 7/17/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/14/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
July 1, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER Granting 33 Motion to Compel and 34 Motion for Sanctions re Discovery and awards Defendant Sheriff Gillespie $570.00 in attorney's fees, to be paid no later than 8/3/2015. Additionally, Plaintiff is ORDERED to provide proper responses to the interrogatories and requests for production within 14 days of this Order. Plaintiff is further ORDERED to provide Defendant with his initial disclosures within 14 days of this Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/1/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
May 27, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 32 ORDER Granting 31 Motion for Leave to Appear Telephonically. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/27/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
May 13, 2015 Opinion or Order Filing 29 ORDER re 26 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney filed by Rodolfo Gonzalez. The Court ORDERS that Plaintiff and Plaintiffs counsel shall personally attend the continued hearing. Any new counsel retained by Plaintiff shall also attend the hearing. No later than May 18, 2015, Plaintiffs current counsel of record shall serve Plaintiff with this order that he appear and shall file a proof of service. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 5/13/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DC)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Gonzalez v. Officer John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Officer John Doe
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Rodolfo Gonzalez
Represented By: Sean K Claggett
Represented By: Matthew S Granda
Represented By: William T Sykes
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?