Yates et al v. Narconon Fresh Start et al
Beret Pugh, Dean Pugh and Charis Yates |
Association for Better Living and Education International, Narconon Fresh Start and Narconon International |
2:2014cv00837 |
May 27, 2014 |
US District Court for the District of Nevada |
Las Vegas Office |
Nancy J. Koppe |
Gloria M. Navarro |
Fraud or Truth-In-Lending |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 Diversity-Fraud |
Plaintiff |
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
Document Text |
---|
Filing 57 ORDER re Plaintiffs' 56 Motion for Release of Bond Obligation. Responses due by 11/18/2015. Replies due by 11/20/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/12/2015. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - NEV) |
Filing 55 ORDER DISMISSING CASE with Prejudice Granting 54 STIPULATION of Dismissal. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 8/14/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - TR) |
Filing 45 ORDER DENYING TRANSFER re MDL NO. 2598. Signed by MDL Panel Chair Sarah S. Vance. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ) |
Filing 38 ORDER Denying as premature 30 Motion to Stay. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 11/17/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Filing 17 ORDER Granting 12 Motion for Demand for Security of Costs. Bonds due by 8/7/2014. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/31/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - SLR) |
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.