Rivera v. Wolfeson et al
| Juan Rivera |
| Pam Weckerly, Danielle Pieper, Philip S. Kohn, Edward R.S. Kane, T. Ivie and Steven Wolfeson |
| 2:2014cv01288 |
| August 6, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Jennifer A. Dorsey |
| George Foley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 Civil Rights Act |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
4
ORDER adopting 3 Report and Recommendation. It is further ORDERED that this case is DISMISSED. The Clerk of Court is directed to close this case. Signed by Judge Jennifer A. Dorsey on 10/27/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - DKJ)
|
|
Filing
2
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Clerk of the Court shall send Plaintiff an Application for incarcerated individuals to Proceed in Forma Pauperis in the United States District Court for the District of Nevada. The Clerk of the Court shall also send Plai ntiff a civil rights complaint form. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until September 12, 2014 to file an Application to proceed in forma pauperis or to submit the appropriate filing fee or the above captioned case shall be dismissed. Signed by Magistrate Judge George Foley, Jr on 8/15/2014. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - complaint and IFP application mailed to Plaintiff along with copy of this order DKJ)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
