Jones v. Mountainview Hospital et al
| Janie Marie Jones |
| Ali Pardis Dana, MD and Mountainview Hospital |
| 2:2014cv01301 |
| August 8, 2014 |
| US District Court for the District of Nevada |
| Las Vegas Office |
| Andrew P. Gordon |
| Nancy J. Koppe |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 Fed. Question |
| Defendant |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER that 34 Motion to Compel is DENIED as moot. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 8/27/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
43
ORDER that 33 Motion to Extend Discovery re 15 Scheduling Order is GRANTED. Discovery due by 9/11/2015. Motions due by 10/9/2015. Proposed Joint Pretrial Order due by 11/6/2015. FURTHER ORDERED that 42 Motion to Withdraw is GRANTED. Signed by Magistrate Judge Nancy J. Koppe on 7/10/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER that 10 Motion to Dismiss is GRANTED. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's EMTALA claim is DISMISSED without prejudice. FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff shall have until May 28, 2015, to file a Second Amended Complaint in this action. Failure to file by this deadline will result in the dismissal of Plaintiff's EMTALA claim with prejudice. Signed by Chief Judge Gloria M. Navarro on 5/21/15. (Copies have been distributed pursuant to the NEF - MMM)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the Nevada District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
